Posts Tagged ‘Schoolyard’

Flashbacks From the Schoolyard: How to Handle Bullies at Work

Friday, July 9th, 2010

For every harassment complaint I’ve helped resolve, I’ve dealt with ten incidences involving the copy opportunity jerk. The boss who constantly criticizes, demeans, and undermines his employees. The supervisor who takes delight overworking and exploiting subordinates. The employee who taunts and intimidates his coworkers. In fleeting, the workplace bully.
Unfortunately, you can’t send your workplace bully to the headmaster or make him stay in for recess. The excellent news is that, as a human resource qualified, you have the power to implement the necessary strategies to prevent and/or alleviate bullying in your workplace. In this article, we’ll look at how you can use policies, hiring, and top management support to make a bully-free workplace.
Beating Up the Bottom Line
It’s simple to reckon that rudeness or incivility is an inevitable part of people working together; after all, who hasn’t been snapped at by a stressed-out boss or coworker?
But bullying is not occasional rudeness or incivility, nor is it a misguided attempt to get things done through tough management. Bullying is an ongoing and systematic campaign of interpersonal destruction. It tends to be an accumulation of many incidences over a long period of time which, taken together, these instances add up to persistent, abusive behavior designed to make the target feel upset, humiliated and threatened.
According to the U.S. Hostile Workforce Survey 2000, the most standard bullying tactics include:
? blaming others for errors
? raising fake concerns about or criticizing the work of others
? making unreasonable demands
? yelling and screaming
? threats of job loss, insult, or place-downs
? inconsistent enforcement of illogical rules
? social exclusion
? stealing credit for a further’s work
Bullying/general hostility is 4 times more prevalent than illegal discrimination and harassment. In fact, a February 2000 study funded by the British Occupational Shape Research Foundation revealed that out of 5300 employees in 70 organizations, 47% reported witnessing bullying in the past five years, 1 in 10 said they’d been bullied in the last six months, and 1 in 4 said they’d been bullied in the past five years.
Bullying Versus Harassment
Unlike illegal forms of harassment and discrimination, bullying isn’t directed at a person because of his or her religion, gender, age, race or other demographic variable. S/he isn’t interested in obtaining sexual favors or dominating a vulnerable group. In fact, the target of bullying is most likely to be selected because of her popularity and competence, which is perceived as a direct threat to the bully.
Unlike a sexual harasser’s need to take advantage of a name in a vulnerable spot, bullying is an effort to control a threat (and prevent exposure of inadequacy). Unlike the power motive behind harassment and discrimination, envy and jealousy are the primary drivers of bullying behavior. And, unlike the racial slurs or sexual comments found in illegal forms of harassment, workplace bullying tends to appear as petty criticism, the withholding of critical information, and/or fake allegations of underperformance.
A further difference between generic bullying versus hostility directed at a protected class are the available legal remedies. Discrimination law does not cover bullying. If the behavior does not have a sexual, racial or physical component, U.S. laws aren’t set up to deal with an incompetent or cruel supervisor bullying a subordinate.
But, bullies may not completely escape the long arm of the law. More and more stress-related workman’s comp claims and intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuits because of workplace bullying. A few years ago, two employees in Texas were awarded $250,000 in hurts after a supervisor continually yelled at them, place his head down and “charged at them like a bull,” and made at least one employee wear a sign that said “I quit.”
Spotting The Bully at Work
Given the statistics of workplace bullying, chances are that there is at least one bully poisoning your organization. Here are three ways you can start to assess how bully-tolerant your work environment currently is:
1. Conduct an anonymous employee satisfaction survey, asking questions specifically about employee experiences of common bullying tactics.
2. Conduct fixed exit interviews and question specifically about interpersonal problems that might have led to their resignation.
3. Keep footstep of turnover statistics by department, by manager, and by unit. As the ancient saying goes, numbers don’t lie. In this situation, they might be telling the truth about a bully in your midst.
Is the Finger Pointing Back at You?
“You’ve got to sit on people to get the job done.” “If you don’t boss people around, they don’t respect you.” “We run a tough ship around here.” How many times have these kinds of arguments been used to justify inappropriate management conduct? Worse yet, how many times has it been rewarded?
A study that looked at predictors of job satisfaction across cultures found that the feature of the employee/supervisor relationship was one of two consistent factors across twenty countries. Employees who feel supported, positive, and treated honestly by their direct supervisors develop a significance of organizational stanchness. Yet, while at least fifty percent of all turnovers are due to poor management practices, the mythical link between inappropriate behavior and productivity still lingers. If your corporate environment seems to be stuck in survival-of-the-fittest mode, it may be time to work with senior management on assessing your corporate principles and realigning them with the realities of today’s workplace.
There’s a further way your corporate environment can unintentionally foster bullying – through job strain. One of the most common problems I encounter is the situational bully, i.e., the valuable manner who, because of an excessive workload or unrealistic deadline, becomes a domineering tyrant. If you observe an increase in inappropriate workplace behavior, do a small investigating to see what’s underneath and what you can do about it.
If your business is cyclical for example, consider partnering with an EAP program previous to your busy season and place forward self-development seminars on coping with stress, time management, and other helpful topics. If the behavior seems to occur primarily in new managers, reevaluate your management development program to see where communication skills are lacking. Supervisors are evenly promoted because of their technical expertise and, if they lack the management skills to be effectual leaders, can resort to bullying in an attempt to establish authority. And, while there are likely to be a few terrible apples in every bunch, some inappropriate workplace behavior is a symptom of a deeper corporate problem – one worth finding and fixing.
Don’t Forget to Place It in Writing
Workplace policies rarely work unless the behaviors they question for are supported and modeled by senior management. When they are, they become a powerful communicator of your company’s principles and priorities. Not only do they set clear expectations of what behavior is expected, they communicate a certain tone that tells employees how senior management views them.
A workplace conduct policy, when consistently enforced, can communicate the message that employees are as valuable as customers – and should be treated with the same respect. Given that there is a direct link between customer satisfaction and employee satisfaction, perhaps this message is consistent with reality. While an extensive discussion on policy development is beyond the scope of this article, here are six guidelines to help you get started crafting your workplace conduct policy:
? Outlines clear examples of what workplace conduct violates the policy
? Details the disciplinary procedures for policy violation.
? Provide a procedure for reporting and investigating concerns about workplace behavior.
? Outlines guidelines for multiple channels of reporting to individuals who feel the policy has been violated.
? Assures complainants that the matters will be treated as confidentially as possible and that no one will be punished for reporting a workplace conduct violation.
?Starts with a message from your CEO, who expresses employees’ rights to be treated with dignity and respect, and who links the policy to the bottom line and to company principles.
Taking a Stand
Like it or not, it’s impossible for corporations to take a neutral spot regarding workplace bullying. To your employees, ignoring it is condoning it. And a policy is no substitute for people; the best antibullying policy will be viewed with disbelief if your corporate culture rewards bullying managers.
The excellent news is that you’re in a valuable spot to beef up the company’s bottom line. Eliminating inappropriate workplace behavior will reduce turnover, increase job satisfaction, and help your organization get back some of the 18 million work days lost each year because of it. At a time when human resources are increasingly being questioned to justify their existence, the opportunity to show the bottom line impression of your efforts is a touch worth shouting about. Just don’t do it at work.

Bullying – Adults In The Schoolyard

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

The thought of bullying has long been associated with naughty children in a schoolyard. But in recent years, there has been increased awareness and recognition in Australia that adults can be bullies too. Nowhere is this notion more alive than in the workplace, where high stress levels and hierarchies make a framework for day to day life.
While the terribly behaved child may be ordered to stay away from school for a day, a bully in the workplace risks paying for her or his mistakes in a courtroom. Even if there is no single statutory avenue for a claim in bullying, recent cases in New South Wales reveal that there are a number of ways to seek redress and claim hurts if an individual has been bullied in the workplace.
Bullying – what does it mean?
There is no official legal definition of bullying but there are a number of key characteristics that are commonly used to describe bullying. The Law Society of New South Wales describes bullying as behaviour that “intimidates, offends, degrades, insults or humiliates an employee, possibly in front of co-staff, clients or customers and which includes physical or psychological behaviour”.
The elemental ingredients of bullying are:
behaviour that intimidates, offends or humiliates;
behaviour that places a name’s physical or psychological welfare at risk;
usually, there is an element of repeated treatment or persistence (but this is chose on a case-by-case basis);
and there is no intention needed.
Examples of bullying include sarcasm, threats, teasing or even physical isolation. In the 1997 case of Dillon v Arnotts Biscuits Ltd, a factory hand was forced to work at an isolated workstation with her back to other employees, because the boss wanted to “toughen her up”. This was described by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission as “incessant bullying”. On the other hand, one off instances such as a name swearing when they are stressed may not be considered bullying.
Claiming for hurts
The Occupational Shape and Safety Act 2000 is perhaps the most direct basis upon which to claim hurts for bullying in a New South Wales workplace. The first stated goal in s 3 of this Act is precisely concerned with securing and promoting the “shape, safety and welfare” of people in the workplace. In s 8 of the Act, the duties of an employer are listed more specifically. Among other things, an employer is responsible for “ensuring that systems of work and the working environment of the employees are safe and without risk to shape”.
In the 2004 case of Inspector Maddaford v Coleman, the New South Wales Industrial Relations Commission confirmed an earlier choice that a timber joinery company had breached its duty under s 8 of the Occupational Shape and Safety Act 2000 by fault to ensure a healthy and safe workplace. In this case, a 16 year ancient factory hand was the subject of violent bullying – he was wrapped in plastic by his co-staff, rolled around on a trolley and covered in sawdust and glue. What is appealing here is that the boss and factory foreman were found to be personally liable under s 26 of the Act (liability of managers and directors), even though they were not frankly involved in the incident. Indeed, if the risk of bullying is foreseeable, employers can be held liable. In other words, they do not only have to react to bullying, they also need to be proactive in eliminating it so that they ensure a healthy and safe working environment.
So the claim for bullying succeeded … but what were the hurts? When the case was first heard, the company was fined $24,000 and the boss and the factory foreman were personally fined $1000 each. But, in the second hearing, it was found that the penalties imposed were too low due to the seriousness of the topic and the need for deterrrance. In other words, because bullying is evenly hidden or not talked about, the court felt that deterring bullying in the future was a significant factor in determining the penalty. Ultimately, the personal fines were bumped up to $9,000 for the boss and $12,000 for the factory foreman, who was frankly responsible for supervising employers. Obviously, the courts have realised that bullying is not a topic to be taken lightly.
Other avenues to claim for hurts
In some cases, bullying in the workplace may become so unbearable that a person is forced to resign from their job. Where this occurs, it may be possible for a person to claim for hurts under the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW). This means that because a personal is effectively forced to resign from their job, an unfair dismissal claim arises and a person may be able to seek compensation. In Dillon v Arnotts Biscuits, the court found that the incessant bullying of a factory hand by her boss had led to “constructive dismissal”. She recommenced her work and was reimbursed for her lost income.
Bullying in the workplace may also make a claim for hurts if it constitues a form of discrimination. In New South Wales, it is against the law to bully or harass a name on the basis of their race, sex, pregnancy, marital status, religious beliefs, sexuality or disability. This thought is captured in the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), but there are also a number of Commonwealth Acts which prohibit discrimination in (and out) of the workplace.
From the boardroom to the courtroom
Bullying is terrible for the workplace because it reduces efficiency, motivation and self-confidence, as well as increasing stress, anxiety and mental shape days. But nowadays, bullying in the workplace is also a potential lawsuit. It is apparent in the law and in the courtroom that bullying can give rise to claims for hurts in New South Wales.